Elijah Mock Bib
Brankov, Jovana, et all. “Geography And Environment–Analysis Of Indicators Of Sustainable Development Of Tourism.” (IJCRSEE)International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering, and Education. Vol. 5. No. 1. 2017. pp.131-140
The research conducted by Dr. Brankov and her partners illustrate the decline in health of the National Park Tara and the potential causes for it (Brankov 133). The researchers question whether or not the rise in tourism has led to the destruction of local wildlife communities and the displacement of some animal and plant species. In order to test this, Brankov observed damages to trees in six main categories: "Dry bare trunks, phytopathological damage, pathogenoous changes, tree breakdowns, mistletoe, and entomological damage" (Brankov 135). In her studies, she found that local insect species and dryness of the environment were to blame. She did however illustrate that while major changes to the health of the tree population were not caused by tourism, waste management and litter cluttering the park and river "would damage the living world" (Brankov 139). She goes on to say in her own words that "tourism in the studied area did not make any significant damage to the environment." (Brankov 139). In conclusion, Brankov states how tourism has had no major change in the overall health of the park and shows that natural events are to blame for fluctuation in the health of the tree and animal life.
The research conducted by Dr. Brankov and her partners illustrate the decline in health of the National Park Tara and the potential causes for it (Brankov 133). The researchers question whether or not the rise in tourism has led to the destruction of local wildlife communities and the displacement of some animal and plant species. In order to test this, Brankov observed damages to trees in six main categories: "Dry bare trunks, phytopathological damage, pathogenoous changes, tree breakdowns, mistletoe, and entomological damage" (Brankov 135). In her studies, she found that local insect species and dryness of the environment were to blame. She did however illustrate that while major changes to the health of the tree population were not caused by tourism, waste management and litter cluttering the park and river "would damage the living world" (Brankov 139). She goes on to say in her own words that "tourism in the studied area did not make any significant damage to the environment." (Brankov 139). In conclusion, Brankov states how tourism has had no major change in the overall health of the park and shows that natural events are to blame for fluctuation in the health of the tree and animal life.
Comments
Post a Comment